You are currently viewing Identifying isotropic vs anisotropic gemstones
Photo courtesy of Reddit

Identifying isotropic vs anisotropic gemstones

The Red Trickster ~

When the Great Imperial Crown was made for the coronation of Catherine the Great in 1762 the court jewelers believed they were topping over 5,000 diamonds and pearls with an enormous 398 carat ruby. But it was never so. They had been fooled by a charming imposter.

When assessing gemstones, professionals will encounter many with similar colors and essential appearance.

From left to right: Tsavorite, Green Tourmaline, Chrome diopside.

From left to right: Ruby, Spinel, Garnet

From left to right: Sapphire, Cobalt Spinel

Proper identification

So what is the best approach for separating and correctly identifying gemstones with similar color and appearance? For certain, one of the first and most important scientific determinations is whether the gem’s light behavior is homogenous or heterogenous.

Identification using light behavior

In simple terms, the essential difference between a homogeneous body and a heterogeneous body is whether a beam of light will be broken into two beams after entering the gemstone.

For homogeneous gemstones: Light does not break down after entering the medium. It propagates with a fixed refractive index in all directions (single refraction). This light behavior is known as optical isotropy.

For heterogeneous gemstones: Light breaks down inside the gemstone and propagates with two different refractive indices (double refraction). Unless it comes from a special direction, light becomes decomposed into two polarized beams with perpendicular vibration directions and different propagation speeds. This light behavior is known as optical anisotropy.

The measure of a gemstone’s optical anisotropy is its birefringence. This is often quantified as the maximum difference between refractive indices exhibited within the gemstone.

Identification using instruments

From the perspective of gemological testing there are reliable tools which can effectively determine whether a gemstone is homogeneous or heterogeneous.


Refractometers measure the angle of refraction of light within a gemstone, correlating them to established refractive index values. Homogenous gemstones will show only one fixed refractive index under the refractometer. Heterogenous gemstones will have two refractive indices, and the values of the two refractive indices will be changed when tested at different positions.


A dichroscope is a simple and portable identification instrument which utilizes a dichroic mirror. Under a dichroscope a homogeneous gemstone displays only one color, while a heterogenous gemstone can display two to three different colors in different directions.

In addition to educated identification, a gem cutter can use a dichroscope to visualize different colors in the rough, identify the strongest and properly orient the stone before cutting to optimize results.

Dichroism seen in a dark blue sapphire

Even when mining, spinels and rubies can be observed through a dichroscope for identification. Spinel is a homogeneous body so only one color appears, whereas ruby is heterogeneous so two colors appear. With that said, there are certain limitations to the instrument.

Limitations of dichroscope

The more portable and simple the identification device, the more restrictions and limitations it has. For this reason dichroscope analysis is best applied to transparent colored gems. When opacity is present the instrument cannot reliably judge whether the gemstone is homogenous or heterogenous. For example, it cannot separate spinel from ruby in every situation, whereas examination with a refractometer makes the difference between the two clear at a glance.

The red trickster

Chemically, a red spinel is composed of magnesium, iron, oxygen, and chromium, while a ruby is the mineral corundum. But spinel occurs in the same red and blue colors as rubies and sapphires, forms under the same geological conditions and is found in the same rock formations as ruby. Prior to 1783 no differentiation was made between spinel and ruby. A century later the red trickster was still fooling people.

Famous false rubies

The Timur Ruby is a 352.5 carat gem named after the founder of the Timurid Empire. It was believed to be a ruby until 1851. The spinel was set into a necklace and presented to Queen Victoria in 1853.

Similarly, the 170 carat Black Prince’s Ruby, one of the oldest in the UK’s collection of Crown Jewels, along with the original red trickster from this post, adorning the Imperial Crown of Russia, were eventually proved to be homogeneous gemstones, and thus spinels.

Best practice

To most reliably identify a gemstone as a homogeneous body or a heterogeneous body, its refractive index needs to be measured under a refractometer. The homogeneous body will have only one refractive index, and the heterogeneous body will have two refractive indices.

For example, the refractive index readings of spinel and ruby are completely different. Spinel is usually 1.718 while ruby is usually 1.762-1.770. And, returning to the premise of this post, two changing refractive index values imply a heterogeneous, doubly-refractive, anisotropic body.

John Pollard

John Pollard is Senior Director of Education for IGI, overseeing and expanding the institute’s traditional educational offerings and diploma programs, instructed at 14 schools of gemology around the world, along with customized eLearning courses, tutorials, seminars, and webinars for IGI clients across all sectors, including leading luxury brands.

This Post Has 16 Comments

  1. David weinstein

    Very nice. Clear and informative

  2. Edva C.

    Whoever owned The Timur Ruby in 1851 must have had a very bad year ?

  3. Omer

    very nice!

  4. Marina Moriah Bibi

    very interesting article

  5. Marina

    Oh my… I had always hoped to see Imperial Crown of Russia up close!

    1. IGI

      Hi Marina. You may need to visit Russia for this. In fact, the image in this post is a traveling identical replica of the Great Crown made by the Smolensk Diamond Company. The actual crown is believed to have never left Russia. It’s a permanent part of the Treasury of the Diamond Fund of the Russian Federation and was last used during a state event in 1906.

  6. Ilan

    Amazing !

  7. Shirley Hazan

    Wow, what an amazing crown!

  8. Mikael

    Very nice crown!!

  9. ปั้มไลค์

    Like!! I genuinely thank you for your information.

  10. Daryle Wooley

    I enjoyed this!
    Please read Revelations 21
    Simply incredible to read a passage several thousands of years ago that talks about anisotropic stones.

Leave a Reply